Skip to main content

President Trump Shouldn't be In the White House

Hello All,

 Would you agree that President Trump is a misogynistic, scientifically illiterate moron who should be nowhere near our nuclear weapons or the White House? He denies climate change despite the overwhelming evidence, and if you look at what the Republican Party is, it's a shell of what it once was under Lincoln. Republicans think that all the other countries are out to get us. Instead,we should just make friends and find our niche in a global economy. Trump has canceled research verifying greenhouse gas cuts. If America wants to remain a superpower without throwing its weight around to get what it wants, then it needs to move away from fossil fuels, every job in the fossil fuel industry could be outsourced to another industry, workers who maintain oil and natural gas pipelines can go into the plumbing industry, or on maintaining the coolant systems on nuclear reactors. Chemists could work on developing bioplastics, managers can be outsourced to any industry, the metal could be used to build nuclear reactors or particle accelerators, the welders can build those, it'd be simpler to slowly move away from fossil fuels over the next decade, but if Trump's control over Congress and the Supreme Court doesn't end, then the US will continue to fall behind, if we make advances and eliminate religion, the need for large and costly militaries will disappear, due to lack of tension in Southwest Asia, and debts can be repaid and our understanding of the world advanced. The Supreme Court is, unfortunately, a lost cause, since they don't recall church-state separation stating that Colorado baker Jack Philip's religious beliefs hadn't been considered, so he didn't have to provide a cake for the wedding of a homosexual couple, so the Court needs to become more socially progressive. I mean seriously, the court is upset that the baker's religious beliefs weren't considered? That's odd because the Constitution says, in essence, that all people are equal. To reference the Seattle Times, "'Freedom of religion and religion has been used to justify all kinds of discrimination throughout history, whether it be slavery, whether it be the Holocaust,' one of the commissioners said in 2014. 'And to me, it is one of the most despicable pieces of rhetoric that people can use to — to use their religion to hurt others.'" Even if you ignore the Supreme Court issue the wall is pointless since planes can fly over walls, just a "minor" issue there. To conclude I suggest that Trump and Pence be removed from office if it is found that Russia tampered with the election, and furthermore that they be barred from holding an office of public trust as a result.

Yours In Politics and Reality,
   D
   Moderate Liberal 
   Agnostic Atheist
   Running Enthusiast
   LGBT+ Ally
Illegal Immigration Research Resource.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/03/06/us/politics/undocumented-illegal-immigrants.html

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I Have A Plan to Infiltrate the Anti-Vaxx Community

Hello All,    I'm writing this post to let you know that I intend to go undercover in anti-vax groups on Twitter, I will not reveal the details of my account so that once I post about conversations I have, I can continue to troll around. If you know of any prominent anti-vaxxers, please comment and give their twitter handle. Yours In Reality,    D
Post a Comment
Read more

5 Questions Atheists Cannot Answer (Answered)

Hello All,    Sorry I haven't posted in a while, between running and schoolwork I've been busier than normal, so here's a new post. So, SJ Thompson, a religious apologist, specifically Christian, has posted 5 questions for atheists, this post is from May of last year, but I just found it today perusing the black hole of doom, gloom, and depression that is the internet.  So her first question is, " So, why do even individualists know that we ought to help the weak, feed the poor, and be honest, humble, just, cooperative, empathetic, forgiving and loving? Why is it that all societies, regardless of their practices, know what we   ought   to do? Where did we get this moral compass?" My answer is a quote from the Greater Good Magazine run by UC Berkley, " We are so used to empathy that we take it for granted, yet it is essential to human society as we know it. Our morality depends on it: How could anyone be expected to follow the golden rule without the ...
1 comment
Read more

My Take on the Pa State House Invocation

Hello All,      I'm sure that most if not all of you have read about or heard about the situation that occurred in the Pa State Legislature. I've refrained from comment so far so as it enables me to fully comprehend the intricate nature of this situation.    My objection to the invocation is a legal one. Although I am of the opinion that the invocation shouldn't have happened in the first place, as it proselytized the Christian faith to those who may not share said religious convictions, or to those who hold no religious convictions at all. However, the invocation happened… so it goes. Alex Luchenitser, associate legal director for Americans United for Separation of Church and State said, “Opening prayers should be inclusive and respectful to the whole community, They should never be divisive. They should not proselytize. ” I agree with Mr. Luchenitser’s assessment of what an invocation should be, if it even happens. Here are a few quotes support...
Post a Comment
Read more