Skip to main content

Emily Scheck: Why did it have to Come down to a Decision of the NCAA?

Hello all,
   If you haven't heard about the case of Emily Scheck, a cross-country runner at Canisius College in New York, I'll give you a rundown. So her parents discovered that she is a lesbian and mandated that she come home to undergo conversion therapy, which per the 2018 state of the secular states, a report on the status of separation of church and government, as well a religious equality. The best part about the mandated conversion therapy, it's illegal for minors and Emily, who is in college, is CLEARLY legally an adult, so her defiance of her parents was as an adult, not a minor. Besides, the parents are legally obligated to support her until she turns 21, meaning when she is a junior. (N.Y. Jud. Court Acts Law § 413)  per the Buffalo News, Emily is only 19, meaning the parents are still legally obligated to support her. https://buffalonews.com/2018/11/16/disowned-being-gay-emily-scheck-canisius-ncaa-running-gay-lesbian/
Though her parents apparently termed what they wanted her to attend "counseling" that's just religionese for conversion therapy. Though, and I quote, "Scheck's father, Timothy, told The Buffalo News that there is much more to the story than his daughter is sharing. The family asked her to participate in counseling sessions, but he said that did not mean conversion therapy. The family accepts her sexual orientation, he said.
Scheck disputes her father's account.
Her father said the family wants her to come home so they can work together to heal.
"It's a private family matter," he said. 'We love our daughter. We accept Emily.'" 
In reality, the events likely unfolded like this, per The Buffalo News, "Scheck, a marketing major, said she was always close with her family until her mother saw the pictures of her daughter and girlfriend in August. This launched a flurry of text messages, none of which changed Scheck's steadfast determination to remain at Canisius. Her mother sent her a text that read, 'Well, I am done with you. As of right now, declare yourself independent. You are on your own. Please don’t contact us or your siblings.'
When Scheck asked her mother why she would do this, she said her mother texted back, 'Because you disgust me.'"
The "Because you disgust me" so blatantly contradicts the family's account, it's more plausible the version that Emily gives is the true event, especially based on the text from her mother I just quoted.

As a result, I personally think that Ms. Scheck should file a lawsuit against her family at a point where she is financially stable, OR the State of New York should charge the Scheck family if possible.

Yours in Politics and Reality,
   D
  Moderate Democrat
  Anti-theist agnostic atheist
   LGBT ally

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

5 Questions Atheists Cannot Answer (Answered)

Hello All,    Sorry I haven't posted in a while, between running and schoolwork I've been busier than normal, so here's a new post. So, SJ Thompson, a religious apologist, specifically Christian, has posted 5 questions for atheists, this post is from May of last year, but I just found it today perusing the black hole of doom, gloom, and depression that is the internet.  So her first question is, " So, why do even individualists know that we ought to help the weak, feed the poor, and be honest, humble, just, cooperative, empathetic, forgiving and loving? Why is it that all societies, regardless of their practices, know what we   ought   to do? Where did we get this moral compass?" My answer is a quote from the Greater Good Magazine run by UC Berkley, " We are so used to empathy that we take it for granted, yet it is essential to human society as we know it. Our morality depends on it: How could anyone be expected to follow the golden rule without the ...
1 comment
Read more

Well, I Take Some Time Off to Focus on Running for My Team and Everything Goes to Sh*t

Hello All,    Sorry for the very extended hiatus, I had to take some time away from this blog to focus on running for my team, and I hope you will agree that it paid off, as two weeks ago I ran a 9:44 3200 as a freshman to win my league by 8 seconds (for all the non-runners, 1 second is an eternal hell in distance running) the district meet was okay, but not as successful as leagues.    So I take time off from my blogging for my team... and shit has really hit the fan.  Arkansas, Indiana, Alabama, Ohio, Kentucky, Mississippi, Georgia, Utah, Arkansas, Tennesee, and Missouri all passed acute bans on abortion, with Louisianna and many others on track to join the club. I'd like to add that Alabama has more restrictive than most Muslim Majority countries, in Isreal, it's legal and often free to boot. I hope many evangelical supporters of Isreal find this interesting. Source: https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium.MAGAZINE-shhh-don-t-tell-evangelical-sup...
Post a Comment
Read more

Don't Elect Religious Leaders to School Boards

Hello All,    Clearly electing religious leaders to a School Board is a bad idea. Ex- Rockingham County Board of Education member Ron Price is using an unconstitutional North Carolina law to try and proselytize to the school board meeting attendees as members of the board. Fortunately, some Supreme Court case struck down the law as unconstitutional. The fact that the law was passed is a testament to the stubbornness and indoctrinated nature of the majority of citizens in a state such as North Carolina. The best part is that when a board attorney said that the board would be sued and lose, a CURRENT MEMBER said that said attorney, Jill Wilson should be fired. So if you think religion can mix take it from Thomas Jefferson who advocated Virginia Statute for  Religous Freedom. On religion and government, he says,  "I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should 'make no law respect...
Post a Comment
Read more