Skip to main content

CMU: Communication Management Units, More Like Political Roundups

Hello All,
   I just finished watching a TED talk on secret US prisons, I'll include the link at the bottom. Disclaimer for any government official stalking my blog: I am not advocating anarchy, I am merely stating my view of the cases that CMU's are used to quell political dissidence. Also, stop stalking me, you have better things to do with your one and only very short life. My first example comes from truthout.org, if you find evidence that this source is unreliable, you should feel obligated to state so in the comments, even if it weakens my case and/ or you agree with me. "In August 2008, one year into his sentence, McGowan was transferred to a new isolation unit in Marion, Illinois. It is a prison with a long history of isolating political prisoners through long-term solitary confinement. In the 1970s, the prison was home to a permanent-lockdown unit that even the warden admitted was created to 'control revolutionary attitudes in the prison system and in the society at large.'" This in itself is clear proof that CMU's are used to control political dissidence, though unlike as I stated, only in prison populations. My second quotation will include a number of examples, including members of women's rights movements (time unknown), "That control unit confined numerous political prisoners and inspired other isolation prisons, including a short-lived control unit for women political prisoners in Lexington, Kentucky, and the Administrative Maximum prison in Florence, Colorado, which has also housed dozens of political prisoners.
Marion’s new experiment in isolation is called a “Communication Management Unit.” (Another CMU opened in 2006 at the prison in Terre Haute, Indiana.) The prisoners there are kept under more intensive surveillance and less able to communicate with the outside world. The CMUs place extreme limitations on access to phone calls, mail or visits. People are not placed in CMUs for any disciplinary infraction and are given little explanation as to whether or how they might get back to the general population.
The majority of the men are there for their politics: 60 percent of those held in CMUs are Muslim, many of them are the victims of suspect Homeland Security dragnets. A group of CMU prisoners, including McGowan, has sued the BOP to close the unit. As a result of the lawsuit, Aref v. HolderMcGowan discovered that he was placed in the CMU because he wrote a series of political essays for The Huffington Post and activist newspapers, as well as the political tone of his letters." 
This quotation shows that the CMU's are used to control information from getting in, it also shows that activists like David McGowan are held in the CMU due to his political activism. Though McGowan was originally imprisoned for arson, the censorship of his opinions is unacceptable, though arson is a felony under most legal statutes and shouldn't be condoned either. (This means no burning down a Chik-fil-a LGBT activists, although their donations to anti-LGBT groups are somehow not illegal {Guess the legal system had a brain fail there}https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/chick-fil-a-gay-marriage/.) The BOP themselves have said, " CMUs are designed to provide an inmate housing unit environment that enables staff monitoring of all communications between inmates in a Communications Management Unit (CMU) and persons in the community. The ability to monitor such communication is necessary to ensure the safety, security, and orderly operation of correctional facilities, and protection of the public." So one can infer their definition is easily stretchable to include political dissidents.  Journalists aren't even allowed in, anything they write can be used against the prisoner to punish them, they can't conduct interviews either, they can only come in as friends. My final quotation is from www.witnessesagainsttourture.com, "The BOP plays a cat and mouse game to avoid having to disclose information about or close the CMUs.  After being challenged on the basis of religious discrimination, the prison administration began admitting non-Muslim “balancers” to the prison: environmental activists, organizers for prisoner rights, others who might want to “recruit and radicalize others.” Thus the CMUs were expanded into prisons for political activists and dissidents." Oh even better, they were discriminating on the basis of religion and just balance it out with non-Muslims like McGowan. One could even say that the strict communications control violates the first amendments freedom of speech and of the press (Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.) 

Yours in Politics and Reality,
   D
   Agnostic Atheist
   Moderate Liberal
   Running Enthusiast
   LGBT+ ally
 That blogger guy that might eventually piss off Trump or the Government.  
Ted Talk: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xuAAPsiD768&index=6&list=WL
P.S: The FBI is following the work of the journalist who gave the talk.

x

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

5 Questions Atheists Cannot Answer (Answered)

Hello All,    Sorry I haven't posted in a while, between running and schoolwork I've been busier than normal, so here's a new post. So, SJ Thompson, a religious apologist, specifically Christian, has posted 5 questions for atheists, this post is from May of last year, but I just found it today perusing the black hole of doom, gloom, and depression that is the internet.  So her first question is, " So, why do even individualists know that we ought to help the weak, feed the poor, and be honest, humble, just, cooperative, empathetic, forgiving and loving? Why is it that all societies, regardless of their practices, know what we   ought   to do? Where did we get this moral compass?" My answer is a quote from the Greater Good Magazine run by UC Berkley, " We are so used to empathy that we take it for granted, yet it is essential to human society as we know it. Our morality depends on it: How could anyone be expected to follow the golden rule without the ca

A Dissertation of Sorts on Homosexuality

Hello All,     Back in 2015, only four years ago in the historic Supreme Court case Obgerfell v. Hodges, where the Court legalized gay marriage, the Christian right went crazy. Some groups, such as the Westboro Baptist Church have begun protesting at military funerals, a deplorable act, as the families are grieving for the loss of a member they will never see again. In this essay, I will be stating the arguments for gay marriage, and then those against which I shall refute immediately thereafter. For. The arguments for gay marriage fall under equal rights, change in the concept of "traditional marriage",  law, both US and international, the fact that marriage is not simply for procreation, as infertile couples would then be barred from marriage as well. " Denying some people the option to marry is discriminatory and creates a second class of citizens.  On July 25, 2014 Miami-Dade County Circuit Court Judge Sarah Zabel ruled Florida's gay marriage ban unconstit

Well, I Take Some Time Off to Focus on Running for My Team and Everything Goes to Sh*t

Hello All,    Sorry for the very extended hiatus, I had to take some time away from this blog to focus on running for my team, and I hope you will agree that it paid off, as two weeks ago I ran a 9:44 3200 as a freshman to win my league by 8 seconds (for all the non-runners, 1 second is an eternal hell in distance running) the district meet was okay, but not as successful as leagues.    So I take time off from my blogging for my team... and shit has really hit the fan.  Arkansas, Indiana, Alabama, Ohio, Kentucky, Mississippi, Georgia, Utah, Arkansas, Tennesee, and Missouri all passed acute bans on abortion, with Louisianna and many others on track to join the club. I'd like to add that Alabama has more restrictive than most Muslim Majority countries, in Isreal, it's legal and often free to boot. I hope many evangelical supporters of Isreal find this interesting. Source: https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium.MAGAZINE-shhh-don-t-tell-evangelical-supporters-of-israe